Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran" Results 281 - 300 of 537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 11:47 pm by Afro Leo
 Guest posts from David Cochrane, Tracy Rengecas and Denise Nicholson on Africa's IP Forum hosted by South Africa's DTI were very popular, such was the interest in the event.RSA's draft national IP Policy and the notes published by various bloggers (including the views of retired Judge Louis Harms and copyright activist Graeme Gilfillan) are continuing to enjoy traffic. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by INFORRM
Case Law, Strasbourg: Delfi AS v Estonia: Court Strikes Serious Blow to Free Speech Online – Gabrielle Guillemin Privacy: Asking the wrong question – Raymond Wacks Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.3), Glossing over Privacy – Alexia Bedat Cyber-bullying: What happens next? [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
” In the leading case of Cochrane v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
Virginia) and those who were under 18 at the time of their crime (Roper v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Kevin Noonan
  This reasoning can be seen in early cases, such as the Wood-Paper Patent cases, and Cochrane v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 6:33 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Thursday, January 17, 2013:#Ottawapiskat Sheriffs, state lawmakers push back on Obama gun control initiatives "AvoidAClaim" Blog | Self-Represented Litigants: A Survival Guide by Carol Cochrane Attorney, had affair with divorce client, billed her for time they spent having sex Roe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am by William A. Ruskin
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:52 am by Lisa Stam
 Many had thought the AODA standards would become a kind of checklist or enumerated criteria that an organization must meet, something we began to see in the HRTO cases, Wozenilek v 7-Eleven and Polangio v Cochrane. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Schachtman
In the Celebrex/Bextra litigation, both sides acknowledged the general acceptance and validity of meta-analysis, for both observational studies and clinical trials, but attacked the other side’s witnesses’ meta-analyses on grounds specific to how they were conducted. [read post]