Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran"
Results 301 - 320
of 525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
It seems that a claim that the prosecution "tricked" her into saying that her father sexually abused her could be construed as at least an implicit charge of improper influence, which would suggest that I would agree with the majority opinion of Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas in Klein v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm
In the case, Monday v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Preview: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Twitter libel trial about meaning and serious harm Case Law: “Spiller v Joseph – the New Defence of Honest Comment” – Catherine Rhind Case Law: Iqbal v Dean Manson, harassment by letter – Edward… [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
– Brian Cathcart Case Law, Strasbourg: ML and WW v Germany, Article 8 right to be forgotten and the media – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills Case Law: Venables v News Group Papers, Application to Vary Confidentiality Injunction Dismissed, PJS extended – Samuel Rowe Case Law: Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court abolished common law presumption of damage in libel cases – Mathilde Groppo Supreme Court considers social media defamation: context… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm
Case Law: ETK v News Group Newspapers “Privacy Injunctions and Children” – Edward Craven Case Law: OPO v MLA, Shock and disbelief at the Court of Appeal – Dan Tench News: Tulisa “Sex Tape”, false privacy turns into true privacy The Perils of “Revenge Porn” – Alex Cochrane La Regina Nuda and Italian Privacy Law – Athalie Matthews and Giacomo Parmigiani Case Law: Růžový Panter, OS v Czech… [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
The issue in a recent case, Cochran v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:19 pm
Several years ago, a California appellate court heard a case where the employee was seeking reimbursement for cell phone charges, even though the employee had a pre-existing unlimited cell phone plan (Cochran v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:44 am
In Gear v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 3:00 am
Williams v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s case (Cochrane v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:22 am
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
See Hill v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
Brandenburg v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:02 pm
App. 774 (2002); Cochran v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 8:33 pm
In today’s case (Cochrane v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 2:14 pm
Black, NAACP v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:02 am
How Daily Mail Editorial Standards are still Falling Through the Floor – Tom Rowland Case Law, Strasbourg: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll “The cases of Vanessa Perroncel and John Terry – a curious legal affair” – Dominic Crossley Dutch Google Spain ruling: More Freedom of Speech, Less Right To Be Forgotten For Criminals – Joran Spauwen and Jens van den Brink Case Law,… [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am
To illustrate their point, the SH&B lawyers discuss the Third Circuit’s opinion in Greenspan v. [read post]
