Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran"
Results 361 - 380
of 537
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
In which Judge Kleinfeld says:"As for whether the error of reading back Officer Cochran’s testimony without an admonition was plain, we conclude that it was. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:03 am
Thorogood v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:53 pm
Liberty and Justice for Y'all brings word of an important new case from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (Cardenas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:19 pm
Cochrane v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:26 am
Last week, in McKithan & Welsh v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
Smith and CLS v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:14 am
Smith and CLS v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Fibre Disintegrating Co., 90 U.S. 566 (1874) (pure cellulose pulp preparation prepared by novel chemical process held not novel over prior art cellulose pulp preparations made by old process); Cochrane v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 1:10 pm
The CCA has previously held, in Briceno v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:43 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Ricky Lee Earp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:04 am
Defective Jury Charge on LIO Woodard v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:18 am
Supreme Court ruled in 1983 in Barefoot v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 6:57 am
" This was a plurality opinion (pdf), with Judge Cathy Cochran providing a concurrence (pdf) in addition to signing onto the majority opinion and Judge Womack - the swing vote - joining Cochran's concurrence. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
Brooks v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:17 am
Pre-emption can also protect against state interference with the national economy.In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:23 am
The opinion in Richard Lynn Winfrey v. [read post]
