Search for: "Cochran v. Cochran" Results 381 - 400 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809 and R(McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] EWCA Civ 1510 stand in the way of the alternative construction argued for the occupiers (ie that they could bring their gateway (b) defence in the county court, rather than by commencing a fresh JR application). [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:10 am by R.J. MacReady
Today the CCA handed down published opinions in the following cases:PD-1205-08, State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Price, joined by Judges Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, and Cochran, first set out that testimonial statements are statements that an objective witness would reasonably believe would be available for use at a later trial. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
The split decision means Cochran's rationale cannot serve as precedent in future rulings about the pre-1991 jury instruction. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:10 am by R.J. MacReady
Judge Cochran concurred (with Price, Johnson, and Holcomb) to warn police to get an explicit waiver because an implied waiver is hard to prove. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am by R.J. MacReady
However, I do think it's kind of ironic that Judge Cochran starts off with quotes from the dissenting opinion from Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
But as Judge Cochran says, they would've been hard pressed to reverse had the trial court suppressed the statement. [read post]