Search for: "Cogen v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by John Bellinger
The issue will continue to be debated amongst international lawyers and in the courts and is likely ultimately to require resolution inside the United States by the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 1:11 am
Contents include:Studies in International Law and OrganizationsČestmír Čepelka, The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: A Reflection Years Later Max Hilaire, The Attitude of the United States Toward International Law Jan Ondřej, Sovereignty and Ownership in Relation to Outer Space and Activities of Private Persons Jakub Handrlica, The Protocol of 1997 to Amend the Vienna Convention on Nuclear Liability and the European Union Michaela… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:29 am by Sarina Kidd
The decision is in line with the International Court of Justice case, Jurisdiction Immunities (Germany v Italy) which determined that state immunity remained even with accusations of a violation of jus cogens. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 4:46 am by Rosalind English
Reasoning behind the decision The Court referred to its judgment of 2001 in the similar case of Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom (no. 35763/97). [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 10:46 pm by William S. Dodge
The views expressed here are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the State Department or of the United States.] [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 7:00 am by Faiza Patel
Rather, destruction facilities are generally built right next to storage sites to avoid the risks of moving them and because national law often (for example in the United States) forbids transport. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:49 am by Sean D. Murphy
He is a member of the United Nations' International Law Commission.] [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm by Wells Bennett
New England, 546 U.S. 320, 329 (2006); see also United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1092Issue: Whether the Fifth Circuit erred when, in direc [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:45 am by William S. Dodge
Department of State, where he worked on the amicus brief of the United States to the Fourth Circuit in Yousuf v. [read post]