Search for: "Cogen v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 83
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2022, 3:19 am by Jan von Hein
Coming from one of the most influential courts in the United States, the Second Circuit’s Kashef decision adds significant weight to the jus cogens argument against the act of state doctrine. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
Arsanjani, Legal Decisions and Their Implementation in International Law Jamal Seifi, Peremptory Norms and the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice Sienho Yee, Some Comments on the Temple (Interpretation) Judgment and the Impact of Possible Mistakes on the Temple Saga Mohsen Abdollahi, Alleged Support of Terrorism as a Ground for Denying State ImmunityHirad Abtahi, Types of Injury in Inter-States Claims: Direct Injury to the State Lucius Caflisch,… [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-29Issue: (1) Whether, in a prosecution for insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:25 am
The question before us is not whether international law prohibits the United States from imposing the sentence at issue in this case. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Since then, numerous other cases, such as United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:54 am
Cassese's October 1995 Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction in Prosecutor v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:21 pm by David Stewart
Just over a year has now passed since the Supreme Court decided, in Samantar v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
Since all EU Member States are party to the Genocide Convention, and the Convention has jus cogens status, these obligations are binding on the Union and its Member States. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
The voting was as follows:  In favour: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam Against: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Republic of Korea, Romania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great Britain and… [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
General Assembly (A/72/162) (the 2017 WG Report) sought to unpacks the concept of access to effective remedies under the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am by Hanibal Goitom
Dodd-Frank Act, despite coming under frequent criticism for its lack of action by the United Nations. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:15 am by Alaa Hachem
In its application, South Africa emphasizes the jus cogens nature of the prohibition against genocide as well as the erga omnes and erga omnes partes character of the obligations owed by States under the Genocide Convention. [read post]