Search for: "Cohan v. Cohan"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
The Cohan Rule, arising from the case, Cohan v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 6:47 pm
And with respect to virtually all of these cases, judges routinely make estimates, relying upon the seminal Cohan v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 4:17 am
Cohan, Cohan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:35 am
Ragassa v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:45 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 11:52 am
There is an old case called Cohan V. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Cohan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:57 am
Despite the SLA’s findings, the court in Joseph Paul Winery v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Cohan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:50 pm
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:50 pm
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:19 pm
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
The married taxpayers in Partyka v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 12:18 pm
HAF v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:05 am
Justice Ling-Cohan decides in Sands Bros. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:16 pm
See Cohan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:28 am
InBanushi v Epstein ;2012 NY Slip Op 30123(U); ; January 11, 2012; Sup Ct, NY County; Docket Number: 402693/10; Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan "In May, 1998, Banushi hired Epstein to litigate a case that was already in progress. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
But if you can’t find one, remember the Cohan Rule, emanating from Cohan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
”* Judge Ling-Cohan pointed out that in interpreting a similar statute, the Court of Appeals has held that the Commissioner of Education’s review powers over the decision of a hearing panel were broad and with regard to any punishment to be imposed, the Commissioner could substitute his own judgment for that of the panel, citing Mutter of Shurgin v Ambach, 56 NY2d 700 and Matter of Letyn v Ambach, 56 NY2d 912. [read post]
