Search for: "Cohan v. Cohan" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2014, 6:47 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
And with respect to virtually all of these cases, judges routinely make estimates, relying upon the seminal Cohan v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:50 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:19 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 9:50 pm by Patent Docs
The panel will discuss how almost a decade after the Supreme Court's decision in Mayo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 11:55 pm by John Diekman
The business judgment rule does not apply when a cooperative board acts outside the scope of its authority or violates its own governing documents.Student note:   Property Law § 234 provides for the reciprocal right of a lessee to recover an attorney's fee when the same benefit is bestowed upon the lessor in the parties' lease.Case:  Cohan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
InBanushi v Epstein ;2012 NY Slip Op 30123(U); ; January 11, 2012; Sup Ct, NY County; Docket Number: 402693/10; Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan "In May, 1998, Banushi hired Epstein to litigate a case that was already in progress. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm by The LBN Team
  But if you can’t find one, remember the Cohan Rule, emanating from Cohan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
”* Judge Ling-Cohan pointed out that in interpreting a similar statute, the Court of Appeals has held that the Commissioner of Education’s review powers over the decision of a hearing panel were broad and with regard to any punishment to be imposed, the Commissioner could substitute his own judgment for that of the panel, citing Mutter of Shurgin v Ambach, 56 NY2d 700 and Matter of Letyn v Ambach, 56 NY2d 912. [read post]