Search for: "Cohn v. Tax"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
CINDY COHN That's U.S. [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
"Where's my Roy Cohn? [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
I'm Cindy Cohn. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am
Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 1:44 pm
COHN, et al. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 494-95 (1975). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:03 am
In one of these cases—Pierce v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:10 pm
Cohn: Connecticut v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
Additionally, before the announcement of the temporary exemptions President Trump stated that the EU would only be excluded from the tariffs if it ended its unfair trade practices and he warned of future taxes on European cars. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
Hutchinson v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 8:32 am
Alan and I talk about one more PlayPen decision, United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 2:47 pm
Cohn Law Firm v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:31 am
School Dist., 295 AD2d 683, 684 [2002] [citations ommitted]), and a breach thereof is material if it is “so substantial that it defeats the object of the parties in making the contract” (Robert Cohn Assoc., Inc. v Kosich, 63 AD3d 1388, 1389 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; accord Accadia Site Contr., Inc. v Erie County Water Auth., 115 AD3d 1351, 1353 [2014]; Fitzpatrick v Animal Care Hosp., PLLC, 104 AD3d 1078, 1081 n 4 [2013]).… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Commentary on Horne v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
