Search for: "Cole v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm by CJ Haddick
The Court stated: “we adopt the two-part test articulated by the Superior Court in Terletsky v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
” At The Nation, David Cole and Amanda Shanor argue that “[t]he First Amendment protects the right to speech, but not the right to get something for nothing. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm by William Ford
Al-Nashiri is accused of planning the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by Nate Nead
Wesley Bosco, Austin Stradling and Colin Cole contributed to this report. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation   [1] R v Cole The post Workplace Privacy Issues appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation   [1] R v Cole The post Workplace Privacy Issues appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm by Kathy Kapusta
Cole, which backed off of marijuana prosecutions—except in certain priority instances—in light of state ballot initiatives legalizing the substance for personal use in small amounts and providing for regulation of production, processing, and sale of [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:54 am by Daniel Cappetta
In response to this argument, the Appeals Court stated, “In [Commonwealth v.] [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am by Sarah Grant, Jack Goldsmith
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]