Search for: "Cole v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am
In 2021 and 2022, several provisions are scheduled to take effect which would raise taxes on business investment in the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
The Court stated: “we adopt the two-part test articulated by the Superior Court in Terletsky v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:34 am
” At The Nation, David Cole and Amanda Shanor argue that “[t]he First Amendment protects the right to speech, but not the right to get something for nothing. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:44 am
” (Schiavone Construction Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm
Al-Nashiri is accused of planning the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:03 pm
Kelsey-Hayes, 854 F.3d 862 (6th Cir. 2017) (retirees prevailed); and Cole v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
Wesley Bosco, Austin Stradling and Colin Cole contributed to this report. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] R v Cole The post Workplace Privacy Issues appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:22 pm
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] R v Cole The post Workplace Privacy Issues appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 6:59 pm
Cole, which backed off of marijuana prosecutions—except in certain priority instances—in light of state ballot initiatives legalizing the substance for personal use in small amounts and providing for regulation of production, processing, and sale of [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:54 am
In response to this argument, the Appeals Court stated, “In [Commonwealth v.] [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:22 am
The following post is by Mark V. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
R v Plant, [1993] 3 SCR 281 at para 45; R v Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, [2004] 3 SCR 432 at para 32; R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53, [2012] 3 SCR 34 at paras 39-58; R v Patrick, 2009 SCC 17, [2009] 1 SCR 579 at para 27. 5 Supra note 4 at para 27. 6 2014 SCC 43, [2014] 2 SCR 212 at para 18. 7 Plant, supra note 4 at para 20. 8 Ibid. 9 Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11. 10 2010 SCC 55 at para 38, [2010] 3 SCR 211, per… [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
Legal Basis The WPR letter’s stated legal authorities for the armed conflict against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, associated forces, and, since August 2014, the Islamic State (ISIS), are the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for the use of military force (AUMF), the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power, and his “constitutional and statutory authority to conduct the foreign relations of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:50 pm
Lambert v. [read post]
