Search for: "Cole v. State" Results 341 - 360 of 1,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 2:43 pm by Stephen Honig
Cole believes that support for the ACLU is simply one aspect of a wide spectrum of reactions by citizenry to the Trump agenda relative to the above matters, as well as to economic penalties to sanctuary cities (Cole says such action is unconstitutional), efforts to roll back Roe v Wade, and AG Sessions’ efforts to roll back gender and voting rights protections and to re-instate draconian sentencing regimes for all drug crimes even not involving violence. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:40 am by Lisa Stam
Expectations of Privacy R v Cole and various cases since have told us that employees in Canada have an expectation of privacy in the workplace that can be diminished but not eliminated by workplace policies. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case, and Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole addressed the current standards for determining willfulness under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole addressed the current standards for determining willfulness under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 7:45 am by Alfred Brophy
Haverty-Stacke, Trotskyists on Trial: Free Speech and Political Persecution Since the Age of FDR Sanford V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]