Search for: "Cole v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am
” Again, while I may disagree that merely stating that one attempted to leave a store is sufficient, the greater legal concept remains. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
” Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton weighs in on the events that have followed the Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
COLE-FRIEMAN & MALLON LLPwww.colefrieman.com July 10, 2014 FATCA Transitional Period. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:44 pm
” On April 14, 2014, Judge Pohl issued an Order in the USS Cole case, United States v. al Nashiri, stating that the government had to turn over ten categories of information relevant to Mr. al Nashiri’s time in the CIA’s RDI program, in effect revealing to the defense the entire history of his torture. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
Donald Yeaples and Deborah Yeaples v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:37 am
Smith v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 1:10 pm
This past week, however, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 10:00 am
Cole in which 17 American sailors died. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
At the time of the USS COLE bombing and the events in question at issue in the commission, the President and Congress declared that the United States was in a state of peace—not in a state of war—in and around Yemen. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:35 am
That asymmetry would incentivize state practice that rolled back the important protections that the law currently provides. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm
As the younger Justice Harlan explained in Noyd v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
Toth v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
Cole and The Sullivans to “encourage prompt departure from the Middle East” by the US and its allies. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:28 am
" It also argued that because the cba used the terms spouse as well as significant other, those terms should be interpreted to be interchangeable.Arbitrator Sarah R Cole has issued an award, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Flood v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Abaclat v. [read post]
