Search for: "Cole v. Younger" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2012, 10:53 am
Coles, David Mark Coles plead no contest to two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a victim younger than 13. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am by Peter Margulies
Councilman and federalism interests favor abstention under Younger v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Adams explained that he had collected them because they did not appear to come from the Cole. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Such concerns are likely overstated, as Alabama argued in its powerful Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:11 pm
The old law allowed a prosecutor to seek the death penalty for anyone convicted of raping a child younger than 12. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:41 pm by Mark Zamora
WE THE PEOPLE from Georgia Justice on Vimeo.This is a video that discussed Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Ferdinand was previously fined £45,000 in 2012 for appearing to endorse a tweet referring to former Chelsea defender Ashley Cole on twitter as a ‘choc ice’, after Cole had to give evidence in support of his then team-mate, John Terry, who had been accused of racially abusing Ferdinand’s younger brother, Anton. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:34 am
The plaintiffs in the case of Betty Nestlehutt and Bruce Nestlehutt v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:40 am by Lisa Stam
Expectations of Privacy R v Cole and various cases since have told us that employees in Canada have an expectation of privacy in the workplace that can be diminished but not eliminated by workplace policies. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
BAC level), whereas HGN does not. 16 A very recent investigation17 found that only HGN was effective at distinguishing persons above or below a BAC of .04%, a standard sometimes applied to drivers of commercial vehicles and, in some states, to drivers younger than 21. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:51 am
But the impact of past decisions may pale in comparison to the Court's resolution, to be made next year, of Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]