Search for: "Coleman v. City of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2014, 8:52 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In her very brief opinion and order in Lee v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:46 am by John Hochfelder
On July 28, 2005, James Coleman was working as a subway track worker repairing tracks for the New York City Transit Authority (the TA). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) The act of tattooing is generally protected by the First Amendment, holds Coleman v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:51 am
Coleman was employed as a recruitment coordinator at a New York City agency for approximately nine months.While performing his duties, he failed to obtain identification information from prospective job candidates even though he had been instructed to do so. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Coleman finally found a job in New York City, commuting each day to and from Philadelphia. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:30 am
The petitioner, Wanda Coleman, claimed that her right to due process was violated when the hearing officer permitted the New York City Housing Authority [NYCHA] to submit an updated ledger into evidence when an administrative hearing was resumed. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 5:59 am
The New York Post has now picked up a slightly shortened version of my City Journal piece on the housing lawsuit that contributed to a voter revolt in Westchester (cross-posted from Point of Law). [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 12:31 pm
[AP/Commercial Dispatch (h/t SB); Coleman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:39 am
NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Landowner's Execution of Lease With City Extinguished Any Claim of Adverse Possession City of New York v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
[Lindsay Lohan attends DailyMail.com & DailyMailTV Holiday Party with Flo Rida on December 6, 2017 at The Magic Hour in New York City. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:46 am
Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to those parts of the first cross motion (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562, 404 N.E.2d 718, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595). [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 5:45 am by Walter Olson
See you in court (5) Update: California courts won't ban homeschooling (3) Update on Mraz v. [read post]