Search for: "Coleman v. Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 12:22 pm
Miller, 9 Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
Bush Presidential Library and MuseumRobert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director, the George Bush Presidential Library and MuseumProfessor Alston V. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:21 am
As far as I can tell, the only other case where a Jackson brief would be of interest to modern lawyers is Coleman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
Even if, as Texas claims, the presidential electors its citizens have selected suffered a purported injury akin to the personal injury allegedly sustained by the 20-legislator bloc in Coleman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:50 pm
Smith, Jr., Miller, Bade and Bress. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:54 am
Coleman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
Coleman v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Most simply, Coleman v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:09 am
Coleman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:02 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:25 am
Gloss (1921) held that Congress has the power to impose ratification deadlines, and the ruling in Coleman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 10:51 am
Smith, Ikuta, Nguyen, Watford, Hurwitz, Miller, Bade and Bress. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
In Baker, for instance, the court cited Coleman v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
Miller. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
In Coleman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
See also Miller v. [read post]