Search for: "Coleman v. State of Connecticut" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
Coleman ("Broadly stated, the issue raised in this appeal  is whether the state of Connecticut may force-feed an inmate who is engaged in a hunger strike as a form of protest. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So holds the Connecticut Supreme Court in Commissioner of Correction v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:05 pm by Michel-Adrien
On Tuesday, October 21, the Connecticut Supreme Court traveled to Fairfield Warde High School to hear arguments in two cases, State of Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:57 am by Joy Waltemath
For this reason, and based on authority indicating that Congress has abrogated state sovereign immunity with regard to the FMLA’s family-care provisions, dismissal on this ground was not warranted (Craig v University of Connecticut Health Center, September 3, 2014, Eginton, W). [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 5:39 am by Daniel Schwartz
The state Supreme Court, in a split decision, has ruled that Connecticut children have the right to sue for loss of consortium in personal injury cases. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
The law would allow anyone sued by a state that bans abortion to countersue in Connecticut for damages and attorneys’ fees. 4. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Coleman Co., 2000 WL 1131893, at *2 (9th Cir. 2000) (in table at 232 F.3d 894). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Check out this case:It basically states that unless your lender actually signs your loan modification agreement then YOU DON'T HAVE A LOAN MODIFICATION.Has anyone actually gotten a signed loan modification? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 818 A.2d 769 (Conn. 2003), the court held that a Connecticut consumer protection claim escaped preclusion under the state’s exclusive product liability statute because the claim “does not seek a remedy for personal injury, death or property damage. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
Ryders Eyewear (Docket Report) District Court Connecticut: High volume of sales during holiday shopping season creates irreparable injury sufficient for TRO: Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Making a Decision at the Dairy Case, Farmers’ Market, or on the Farm As described in Part 1, there is considerable variation from state-to-state in the way raw dairy products are regulated in the US. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
We know these issues would be much different in the Hitchhiker universe, as after all Zaphod and Ford shared three of the same mothers. 9 - The Connecticut Law blog looks at cat bite law and whether a cat will get a free bite (or not.) [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
We know these issues would be much different in the Hitchhiker universe, as after all Zaphod and Ford shared three of the same mothers. 9 - The Connecticut Law blog looks at cat bite law and whether a cat will get a free bite (or not.) [read post]