Search for: "Coleman v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 304
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 6:10 pm by Glenn Reynolds
Those experiences would inform his efforts in three major civil rights cases before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am by Marc Whipple
So last Wednesday (March 22, 2017, if you’re joining us late) the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
Ryan's exception to the landmark rule of Coleman v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 11:04 am by James Kachmar
Based on this evidence, Design Data sued Unigate Enterprise for copyright infringement because of its alleged use of the SDS/2 software and its importation and distribution of SDS/2 generated images and files from outside the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
The State presented Sergeant Steven Schafer of the IMPD Computer and Digital Forensic Unit to testify as an expert in forensic analysis of social media records and digital trails. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
 For a federal habeas court reviewing a state court conviction, `the only question under Jackson is whether that finding was so insupportable as to fall below the threshold of bare rationality.' Coleman v. [read post]