Search for: "Collier v. AT&T Inc. et al" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
When fee shifting is permissible, a court must ascertain the number of hours reasonably expended by the successful party’s counsel in the litigation, multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate
17 Mar 2012, 1:57 pm by PaulKostro
DILIP CHOKSHI, ET AL., __ N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Emilio Braun v. America-CV Station Group, Inc., et al., Docket No. 21-13774
12 Jan 2023, 3:54 pm
Until it wasn’t. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Hepatitis A Outbreaks linked to Frozen Fruit are a problem
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
 Gallot et al., 2011[17]2012 9Pomegranate seeds (frozen)CanadaEgyptSuspect product contamination before export. [read post]
Food Poison Journal - http://www.foodpoisonjournal.com/
Virginia's Sovereign Immunity Overview: a Lawyer's Exceptions
3 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
Virginia Injury Attorney Blog - http://www.virginiainjuryattorneyblog.com/
Egyptian Strawberry Hepatitis A Outbreak
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
  It appears that the strawberries entered the US in Norfolk into VLM USA’s possession and then were transferred to Preferred Freezers Storage, Inc. in Chesapeake into Patagonia’s possession. [read post]
Food Poison Journal - http://www.foodpoisonjournal.com/
California Appeals Court Rules Homeowners Can Sue Banks for Fraud Over Broken Loan Modification Promises
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
Brooks and Bruce T. [read post]
Mandelman Matters - http://mandelman.ml-implode.com
Fourth District Rejects Coastal Act/CEQA-Based Challenges To Commission’s Certification of San Diego Port Plan Amendment As Time-Barred For Failure To Join Indispensable Parties Within Limitations Period
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
California Coastal Commission, et al. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The Supremes Get It Right in Espinosa Chapter 13 Case; The Student Loans Went Away! The Complete Text of Espinosa
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
But it still provides useful instruction, and I therefore commend it to your reading list: 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010) UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., Petitioner, v. [read post]
Arizona Chapter 13 Lawyer Blog - http://www.arizonachapter13lawyerblog.com/