Search for: "Collings v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2015, 4:21 am by sally
Regina (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWCA Civ 328; [2015] WLR (D) 157 ‘In providing approved premises for women released from prison on licence, the Secretary of State for Justice had not discriminated directly under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 or indirectly under section 19. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:20 am by tracey
Griffiths v Secretary of State for Justice (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening): Coll v Secretary of State for Justice (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening); [2013] EWHC 4077 (Admin);   [2014] WLR (D)  136 ‘The Secretary of State for Justice had not discriminated, directly or indirectly, in the performance of his functions of providing approved premises for women released from prison on licence. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:56 am
Van Colle and another v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2008] WLR (D) 284 “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under art 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the… [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Van Colle and Another v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary House of Lords “The test for considering whether the state had violated its obligation to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights was stringent and remained constant; no lower standard applied where the threat to an individual's life arose from the state's decision to call him as a witness. [read post]
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:54 am by tracey
‘The Court of Appeal recently grappled with Approved Premises for women in the case of Coll v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWCA Civ 328. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Queens College of the City University of New York not subject to the City's Human Right Law because it is a State entityJattan v Queens Coll. of City Univ. of N.Y., 2009 NY Slip Op 05746, decided on July 7, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentLincoln Jattan, sued Queens College of the City University of New York to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law § 297[9] and… [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal to the extent of granting a declaration that provision of APs constituted direct discrimination against women, which is unlawful unless justified, and that the Secretary of State has yet to show such justification. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
Statute of limitations for challenging a personnel decision begins running when the individual is notified of the final and binding determination McCarry v Purchase Coll., State Univ. of N.Y., 2012 NY Slip Op 06026, Appellate Division, Second Department In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the decision of the President of the State University of New York College at Purchase not to reappoint an assistant professor to the Purchase faculty,… [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:03 am
Court annuls Commissioner of Human Rights' determination because it lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of unlawful discriminationMatter of Suffolk County Community Coll. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 03184, Decided on April 21, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human found Suffolk County Community College had engaged in unlawful racially discriminatory practices… [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:32 am by tracey
Supreme Court Hartley & Ors v King Edward VI College [2017] UKSC 39 (24 May 2017) Coll, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 (24 May 2017) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA v Glencore International AG [2017] EWCA Civ 365 (24 May 2017) Department of Health v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 374 (24 May 2017) Oraki & Anor v Bramston… [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:02 am by Jay P. Lechner
Coll., a case in which employees complained that a professor’s race-based emails created a hostile work environment. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:24 am
Court annuls Commissioner of Human Rights' determination because it lacked substantial evidence to support a finding of unlawful discriminationMatter of Suffolk County Community Coll. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 61 AD3d 881The Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human found Suffolk County Community College had engaged in unlawful racially discriminatory practices against one of its employees and retaliated against him. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Stress resulting from a lawful personnel action, including discipline, is not a compensable injury within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation LawMatter of Witkowich v SUNY Alfred State Coll. of Ceramics, 2011 NY Slip Op 00454, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThree months after Kenneth Witkowich began serving as the Chief of University Police for Alfred State College he was terminated. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An entity claiming that it is not subject to the State’s Freedom of Information Law has the burden to provide documentary evidence that conclusively establishes such a defense as a matter of lawNassau Community Coll. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Cases designated by an asterisk are ones in which Kavanaugh authored an opinion:Estate of Coll-Monge v. [read post]