Search for: "Colman v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 9:52 am
Comer Today's brief is of Barnwell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 7:44 pm
Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
In a Post-Koken case from back in December, 2016 entitled Colman v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Reckitt & Colman, Inc., No. 81 (N.Y. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Not sure he has new things to say about that general topic.Cathay Smith: In the ideal situation, would Rogers v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:03 am
The court a quo relied on the approach of Harms JA in the Reckitt & Colman case, where Judge Harms said the following at pg 317:"In assessing whether there is a likelihood of deception or confusion it is necessary to consider the whole get-up of the appellant and the whole get-up of the respondent…but it is difficult to do this exercise without having regard to its individual parts." [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:46 am
In support of this, he cited the view of Mr Justice Colman in Navigas v Enron. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Kraemer has a lot to say about state enforcement of cultural beliefs; NYT v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:49 am
On January 25, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 7:59 pm
[1] Reckitt & Colman of India Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
As Kat readers may recall, in May 2015, the UK Supreme Court ruled in the case of Starbucks (HK) v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 6:47 am
" Schall v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
The Court of Appeal disagreed: Airbus v Patel [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 8; but then the House of Lords agreed with Colman J, holding in effect that the English courts should not act as the world's policemen where a non-contractual anti-suit injunction was sought, as this would be contrary to the principle of comity: Airbus v Patel [1999] 1 AC 119. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:23 am
” (citing State Farm Mut. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:26 am
Disputes arose in the late 80s and finally Mr Hashwani appointed Sir Anthony Colman as an arbitrator. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Chris Torrero was the first of a number of folk to prod this Kat into writing about the Myriad gene patent ruling in the Unites States. [read post]
