Search for: "Colorado River Water Conserv. Dist. v. United States"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 6:29 am
Harris,. 401 U.S. 37 (1971) and Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
District Court for Distict of Maryland denied motion to stay on abstention grounds in favor of a pending state court action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD, pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 12:55 pm
The US District Court abstained under Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 7:43 am
June 8, 2006):Claimant argues that this Court should abstain from deciding its equitable claim based on the abstention doctrine set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am
See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 11:21 pm
Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
June 6, 2007) (discussing the applicable standards on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6)).. . .In the alternative, relying on the doctrine established in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
Co. of Am., 316 U.S. 491 (1942), to remand the declaratory judgment action, and that the action for damages fell within the scope of Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
The court concluded that “the federal and state class action merger claims are substantially similar,” id., at 10-11; accordingly, “the ‘parallelism requirement for a [Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:39 am
Valerie moved to dismiss the petition or stay the proceedings under Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:56 am
In affirming the magistrate’s decision, the district court reviewed the case de novo and conducted a detailed analysis on the appropriate standard to apply in evaluating the abstention issue, based on Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v . [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:20 pm
The court concludes that Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:09 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) and Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:16 am
Plaintiffs argued for the test set forth by the Supreme Court in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 3:58 am
” Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:40 pm
The court denied the motion, relying upon the Supreme Court’s admonition in Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Board Issued Curtailment Orders To All 861 Water Right Holders In The Upper Russian River. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
State Water Resources Control Board Issued Curtailment Orders To All 861 Water Right Holders In The Upper Russian River. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
