Search for: "Colorado v. Kansas" Results 141 - 160 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am by Anna Christensen
Nebraska and Colorado; we will publish details on that case shortly. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 10:25 am by John Presper
  Specifically, Ericsson identified its Mobile Broadband group in Plano, Texas; Boulder, Colorado; Seattle, Washington; Pleasanton, California and Atlanta, Georgia. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:17 am by NCC Staff
According to Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, since the appeals came from federal circuits that contain other states, the current rulings in the three circuits should extend to six more states: Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Kyle Kroll
It’s the stuff of nightmares for procrastinating creators in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida! [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm by David J.B. Froiland
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am by Tammy Binford
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:04 am by John Nolon
Their efforts to create no-build zones in the riskiest areas are muted by the threat of regulatory takings actions under Lucas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1301 Young Street, Suite 1169Dallas, TX 75202Voice Phone (214)767-4056FAX (214)767-0432TDD (214)767-8940Region VII - Kansas City (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)Frank Campbell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:04 am by John Nolon
Their efforts to create no-build zones in the riskiest areas are muted by the threat of regulatory takings actions under Lucas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:00 am by Andrew Lowy
Although the Tenth Circuit’s ruling applies to all states within its jurisdiction—Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming—the court’s opinion was immediately stayed pending review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:11 am by NCC Staff
States such as Utah, Kentucky, Kansas, Colorado, Texas, Virginia and Michigan are appealing court rulings that struck down their same-sex marriage bans as unconstitutional. [read post]