Search for: "Colorado v. Kansas"
Results 141 - 160
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Nebraska and Colorado; we will publish details on that case shortly. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
July 6, 2007).Colorado: Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Bank v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
Additional Resources: Kansas v. [read post]
4 Dec 2012, 10:25 am
Specifically, Ericsson identified its Mobile Broadband group in Plano, Texas; Boulder, Colorado; Seattle, Washington; Pleasanton, California and Atlanta, Georgia. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:17 am
According to Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, since the appeals came from federal circuits that contain other states, the current rulings in the three circuits should extend to six more states: Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, West Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
It’s the stuff of nightmares for procrastinating creators in Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida! [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 12:22 pm
Last week, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals (covering Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, plus the portions of Yellowstone National Park in Montana and Idaho) found that a careful “Termination Review” process by independent decision makers can weaken or break the causal connection between the alleged racial animus and the ultimate adverse action. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
That’s because those agencies issued guidance after the Supreme Court’s 2013 United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:04 am
Their efforts to create no-build zones in the riskiest areas are muted by the threat of regulatory takings actions under Lucas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1301 Young Street, Suite 1169Dallas, TX 75202Voice Phone (214)767-4056FAX (214)767-0432TDD (214)767-8940Region VII - Kansas City (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)Frank Campbell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:04 am
Their efforts to create no-build zones in the riskiest areas are muted by the threat of regulatory takings actions under Lucas v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In 1939, in Coleman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
Although the Tenth Circuit’s ruling applies to all states within its jurisdiction—Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming—the court’s opinion was immediately stayed pending review by the Supreme Court. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:11 am
States such as Utah, Kentucky, Kansas, Colorado, Texas, Virginia and Michigan are appealing court rulings that struck down their same-sex marriage bans as unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:55 pm
This means that, although they were not directly before the Court, bans in North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Colorado, Kansas, and Wyoming are also effectively dead. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
V, Sec. 25(b)). [read post]
