Search for: "Com. v. Council" Results 1 - 20 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Massimiliano Di Martino
In its Judgment in Case C-235/09 DHL Express France SAS v Chronopost SA the European Court of Justice ruled that the Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community Trade Mark (the Regulation) creates Community arrangements for trademarks whereby undertakings may obtain Community trademarks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the European Union. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 5:25 pm
The Commission issued a Communication to the European Parliament and the Council "on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005 (COM (2005) 583 final/2). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:10 am by tracey
ebookers.com Deutschland GmbH v Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände – Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband eV: (Case C-112/11);  [2012] WLR (D)  217 “The concept of  ’optional price supplements’, referred to in the last sentence of article 23(1) of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community, covered costs… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The addition of ‘.com’ does not alter the meaning of the word ‘france’ or the idea conveyed by the sign. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by EEM
" Includes a link to the text of a letter to the EU with comments on "the proposal for a Directive on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings, and protecting victims released by the European Commission on 29 March 2010(COM(2010)095), which, once adopted, would repeal the 2002 Framework Decision oncombating trafficking in human beings. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bizimana, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 (02 April 2012) R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd v Bailey [2012] EWCA Civ 410 (02 April 2012) AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395 (02 April 2012) Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 409 (02 April 2012) Kazeminy v Siddiqi & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 416 (02… [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Improper performance of a judicial function by a legislative bodyPorcari v Griffith, 2019 NY Slip Op 00918, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn 2016, the individuals [Plaintiffs] initiating this action were appointed to certain local offices by the Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Improper performance of a judicial function by a legislative bodyPorcari v Griffith, 2019 NY Slip Op 00918, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn 2016, the individuals [Plaintiffs] initiating this action were appointed to certain local offices by the Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:18 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rogers v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1459 (15 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) NYK Logistics (UK) Ltd v Ibrend Estates BV [2011] EWCA Civ 683 (16 June 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Culkin v The Wirral Independent Appeals Panel [2011] EWHC 1526 (QB) (15 June 2011) Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB) (16 June 2011) High Court (Family Division) Cheshire West and Chester Council… [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:33 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faidi & Anor v Elliot Corporation [2012] EWCA Civ 287 (16 March 2012) HK (Afghanistan) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 315 (16 March 2012) Yafai v Muthana [2012] EWCA Civ 289 (16 March 2012) McGuire v Rose [2012] EWCA Civ 288 (16 March 2012) Welsh Ministers & Anor v RWE Npower Renewables Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 311 (15 March 2012) Smith v Butler [2012] EWCA Civ 314 (15… [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
COM ED New York 2013http://t.co/h3mFIbXK0A -> National average of interest rates not protectable by copyright BANXCORP v. [read post]