Search for: "Com. v. Crawford" Results 1 - 20 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2010, 4:55 am by Russ Bensing
The court first dealt with Crawford in State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
It’s been five years now since the US Supreme Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Russ Bensing
  Neither the court nor the parties raised the issue of whether this presented a Confrontation Clause issue under Crawford v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:44 am
Four years after Crawford v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
On the other hand, Scalia’s decision two years ago in Giles v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Russ Bensing
  But that all changed with the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
”  While Crawford and Davis were decided unanimously, Giles v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:40 am
Code 18.2-472.1(D) violates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment as construed by the Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
One of the other things I thought about was a comment by Justice Scalia in the oral argument in Michigan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am by Russ Bensing
  I was prepared for that, and countered with the analogy to Florida v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
The Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant on the scope of Crawford v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Crager (discussed here), the Ohio Supreme Court held that the testimony of laboratory analysts wasn’t subject to Crawford v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Almost two years ago, in State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am by Russ Bensing
  The 3rd District had answered “no,” holding that the right of confrontation, as interpreted in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Russ Bensing
Last June, the Supreme Court ruled in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]