Mere awareness of the other party’s domicile is not the equivalent of purposeful availment; a one-time transaction does not comprise purposeful availment sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant in our state court.
15 Nov 2019, 9:50 am
Zippo Dot Com, 952 F. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
See Ritter v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2016) I will be teaching a course on Corporate Social Responsibility. [read post]