Search for: "Com. v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
§ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1) (emphasis added); see also Taylor Made Software, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:38 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
“Como hombres y mujeres de ley y orden acataremos la decisión, no sin antes agotar todas las vías”, aseguró Marrero. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
El progenitor que incurre en este tipo de comportamiento lo hace mayormente con el propósito de ganar o retener la custodia de los menores para evitar que el otro participe en la crianza de los hijos en común. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
Officer Pacatte handed Brownwood Detective Joe Aaron Taylor a plastic sack that had the items in it. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am by Ben
 In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
COM, 2016 NY Slip Op 26112 https://t.co/KpHhgdHgca -> Kid-friendly Kik app gives predators direct online access to children -> Baidu signs agreement to reduce online IP infringement -> Communication to the public in copyright law – the German struggle with the CJEU concept -> Dog poo + Facebook = $65,000 -> Scholarly Publishing Has Its Napster Moment https://t.co/k4xh7hNEGl -> U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
This Kat was reminded of the recusal situation in the patent action of Resolution v Lundbeck, where Mr Justice Arnold assured us that he was not swayed by his subconscious (see Katpost here).Nike and the Chuck Taylor sneaker: an epic billion dollar dispute (see Katpost here)Annabelle Gauberti spoke about how trade marks are being used in the US to protect the appearance of the Converse ‘Chuck Taylor’ sneaker. [read post]