Search for: "Combs v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm by Alan E. Sherman
Today’s sales tax opinion from the Texas Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Combs v. [read post]
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:06 pm by Federalist Society
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:06 pm by Federalist Society
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm
Federal courts sitting in diversity are “extremely cautious” about recognizing innovative theories under state law (Combs v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:36 am
While diversity of citizenship may be an appropriate base for jurisdiction,  42 USC 1983 is not, at least in Texas  There, the attorney is not a state actor:"In Combs v. [read post]