Search for: "Combs v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2006, 8:40 am
Keith Combs v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:39 am
BAKER V. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm
Today’s sales tax opinion from the Texas Third Court of Appeals in Austin, Combs v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:39 pm
The California Supreme Court, in Martinez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Case Background On July 28, 2011, Richard Combs (Combs) and a friend visited Indian Lake State Park to go fishing. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm
The recent court case of United States of America v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Combs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
State Police (E.D.N.Y. 2022). [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:04 am
The district court properly evaluated the relevant likelihood of confusion factors in light of the evidence presented at trial, including overwhelming evidence of the commercial strength of VAGISIL brand products and Combe’s Eveready consumer survey and a brand recognition, or “fame,” survey (Combe Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:12 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:19 am
Here are the materials in Milne v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 1:03 pm
McCord v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:06 pm
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 5:06 pm
On November 5, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sprint Communications Company v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:29 pm
Federal courts sitting in diversity are “extremely cautious” about recognizing innovative theories under state law (Combs v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
Combs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:43 pm
State v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 5:36 am
While diversity of citizenship may be an appropriate base for jurisdiction, 42 USC 1983 is not, at least in Texas There, the attorney is not a state actor:"In Combs v. [read post]
