Search for: "Combs v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 9:16 am by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which presents a classic statutory interpretation problem. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:47 am
Combs, 379 F.3d 564, 572 (9th Cir. 2004), United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The prosecutors allege, "The Defendant in rem is merchandise that has been introduced into the United States contrary to law, as it constitutes property unlawfully exported from Peru and stolen, smuggled or clandestinely imported or introduced into the United States." [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 6:13 am
That a copy of the catalog is located on a server in the United States … does not change the fact that overall control of the data collection and catalog creation is exercised from Pakistan. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am by Elizabeth B. Carpenter
California: Supreme Court of the United States Says Law Enforcement May Not Look at Contents of Cell Phone without Warrant Can a cop seize your smart phone or flip-top phone and have his way with it — combing through such devices (despite the lack of a search warrant) in a desperate effort to find incriminating evidence against you? [read post]