Search for: "Comcast Corp. v. Behrend"
Results 1 - 20
of 295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
Ill.), the court denied the named plaintiffs’ motion for class certification after striking the testimony of their damages expert, holding under Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:06 am
Buono, 847 F.3d 1108, 1120 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:46 am
The Ninth Circuit also concluded that, under its interpretation of the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 10:44 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011)), damages evidence that is inconsistent with the plaintiff’s theory of liability (citing Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 8:46 am
Under Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
” The court noted the Supreme Court’s “doubt,” expressed in Dukes, that Rule 702 does not apply as well as the fact that the Court granted certiorari in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:29 am
In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:44 am
In the 2013 case Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:41 am
The district court also properly found that plaintiffs’ damages model failed to satisfy the standard set out in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:43 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 1:03 pm
”) Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: The Impact Of U.S. Supreme Court Rulings
16 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
Dukes and the 2013 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:49 am
” Under Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 1:33 pm
Id. at 4, citing Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Dukes and the 2013 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nutraceutical Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 7:26 am
Noting that the Supreme Court had been unable to reach the question later in the case of Comcast Corp. v. [read post]