Search for: "Comer v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Comer, the court held that the state of Missouri violated the free exercise clause when it gave secular private schools aid for playgrounds but denied the same assistance to religious schools. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Mark Walsh
Comer, except that he has only a judgment of the court with respect to Footnote 3, he says. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 This is because the two opposing experts are going have to testify about the state of knowledge of the person skilled in the art with regard to Baldwin's Rules for ring closure. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:27 pm by Jason Mazzone
(Asked about Michigan voters who responded to the Court's decision in Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Comer, in which the court held that “denial of an otherwise available public benefit to religious institutions violated the Trinity Lutheran Church’s First Amendment free exercise rights, even in the face of state constitutional prohibitions on the use of public funds for religious purposes,” observing that the opinion “should provide cause for concern among those who oppose school vouchers generally and those who oppose vouchers for religious schools… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky discuss Davila v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Comer case, a 7–2 Court ruled that blocking state funding to a church violated the Free Exercise Clause. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:13 am by Amy Howe
Comer, in which the justices ruled that Missouri could not exclude a church from a program to provide grants to non-profits to install playgrounds made from recycled tires, and Espinoza v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
Comer; and (2) whether the categorial exclusion of all active houses of worship from historic preservation grants violates Trinity Lutheran and the First Amendment as an exclusion based on religious status. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Kansas, 18-6135 Issue: Whether the Eighth and 14th Amendments permit a state to abolish the insanity defense. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Lyle Denniston
  That was the way the argument came and went Monday in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]