Search for: "Comfort v. Comfort" Results 1 - 20 of 5,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2011, 8:02 am by Marty Schwimmer
Owner of registrations for LIVE COMFORTABLY v La-Z-Boy for use of LIVE LIFE COMFORTABLY. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:34 am by Daily Record Staff
Real property — Foreclosure action — Statute of limitations In 2016, appellees, acting as substitute trustees,1 filed an Order to Docket in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Comfort and Kofi Boateng, appellants. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:02 am
Just in case you have not noticed, there is a move afoot to reopen the school desegregation case, Comfort v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Linda O'Brien (CCH)
Thus, the judgment on the trademark infringement and false advertising claims were reversed and the case remanded (Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:56 pm by WCK Director
Worker Injured Attempting to Retrieve a Bag of Chips Stuck in Vending Machine Receives Award of Benefits  In Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:06 am by Heidi Henson
The complaint filed by the federal agency alleges that Claudia Neal, formerly a front desk clerk at Comfort Inn Oceanfront South and a Seventh-Day Adventist who observes her Sabbath from sundown on Friday until sundown on Saturday, was scheduled by managers to work the evening shift on Friday, December 24, 2010 (EEOC v Landmark Hotel Group, EDNC, No 4:12-CV-158). [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 10:10 pm
Eric also cites a recent case from the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Ohio where the court reached the same conclusion as in the Axciom case (Key v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
The Court added that, while the licence clauses should be taken into account, the determination was ultimately a question for the court, taking into account policy considerations as in Yates Circuit Foil Co v Electrofoils Ltd [1976] FSR 345. [read post]