Search for: "Commercial Credit Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 5:16 pm
On April 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:56 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
McNamara secured the first race discrimination verdict in the United States against a real estate franchise for failure to award a sales agency to an African-American in Tyler v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On August 23, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in Retailer Ventures, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:58 am by Demetrius J. Robinson
Generally, the R&D Credit is not allowable for research that is conducted outside of the United States or its territories, research after commercial production, a pure adaptation or duplication research situation, social science-related research, or for research solely related to surveys, studies, or managerial functions. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:00 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
David Brown is an attorney of Commercial Collections located in the Cleveland office of Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA (WWR) who can be reached at 216.685.1062 and dbrown@weltman.com. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:51 am by Darren S. Teshima
On November 2, 2015, the United States Supreme Court denied investors’ petition for review of a Second Circuit decision affirming the dismissal of their class action against Standard & Poor’s Rating Services’ parent, McGraw-Hill Cos. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:27 pm by Orin Kerr
As Justice Holmes said in a different context in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]