Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 762
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
In Donohue v Cuomo, 2022 NY Slip Op 00910, the New York State's Court of Appeals said:"In Kolbe v Tibbetts, [it] left open whether a New York court should infer vesting of retiree health insurance rights when construing a collective bargaining agreement* (CBA) (see 22 NY3d 344, 354 [2013]). [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v… [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
On Tuesday 8th February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
We affirm the judgment of the trial court. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm
European Court of Human RightsKarataş v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
” These are positive steps forward, but we would like to see Biden officials demonstrate an even stronger commitment to this vital constitutional principle — in court cases, such as an upcoming Supreme Court case in which a public-school coach claims the right to pray with students in his official capacity, and in all other areas in which the administration has power or influence. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
") A New Jersey federal judge backed a special master's order that Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The trial court sustained the Board’s demurrer without leave to amend, holding that the registration was exempt from CEQA as a ministerial act. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Charles Arbogast v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:26 am
In our recent paper, we critique Abbott’s proposal whilst contemplating AI’s status as property or person.It is perhaps most interesting to compare the contrasting fortunes of the Project’s filings in Australia (Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879) and England and Wales (Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs And Trade Marks [2020] EWHC 2412 (Pat)/Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021]… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
Supreme Court ruled that the Oklahoma statute would not be recognized for federal i [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:52 pm
We reject Sawant's argument that this case is controlled by New York Times Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:12 am
John Deere Co. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:46 am
Roche v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Parkes v Hall and Ors [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
University Club reaffirmed the narrowness of the D.C. statute, holding that it doesn't apply to a club's ejecting a member because of his general political beliefs (as opposed to party affiliation).[8] Arboleda v. [read post]
