Search for: "Commissioners v. Bank of Commerce" Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
But it might nevertheless have a great impact: Should the Court of Justice eventually adopt his opinion, in the closely watched case of Schrems v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
National Australian Bank, Ltd. governs whether a proposed application of the Alien Tort Statute would be impermis [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm by Jillian Moss
Senate confirmed Rohit Chopra, currently a commissioner of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 9, 10 and 11 July 2019 there was a trial in the case of Boyo v Lloyds Bank Plc before Anthony Metzer QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 6:01 am by Peter Swire
In June, Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo met with EU Commissioner Didier Reynders and tweeted: “We have a shared commitment to find a comprehensive successor to Privacy Shield that is fully in line w/ the Schrems II requirements & w/ US law. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
This case involves the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and the Indian Commerce clause of the constitution. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(RelatIP) New procedure at the Brazilian Patent Office for the application of article 32 of the Industrial Property Law (IP tango)   Canada 30 more candidates add their support for the copyright pledge (Michael Geist) CBC on copyright pledge (Michael Geist) Copyright pledge gains momentum - Green Party and New Democrats Party (NDP) candidates on board (Michael Geist) Conservative Party platform on copyright (EXCESS COPYRIGHT) (Michael Geist) Copyright in local election debates (Michael… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
Trademark Review and Appraisal Board of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (China Blawg) Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court: TRAB ordered to re-decide TUAN TOURAN review application: Volkswagen Inc v Trademark Review And Appraisal Board Of The State Administration For Industry And Commerce Of The People’s Republic Of China (China Blawg) Just Do It? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm by Tom Goldstein
National Australia Bank Docket: 08-1191 Argument date: Will be set for argument in March or April 2010 Question presented: When may federal courts hear a suit by foreign plaintiffs alleging that they were harmed by securities fraud in a transaction conducted overseas but that nonetheless has ties to the United States? [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Citing Campbell v Acuff and Sun Trust Bank v Houghton Mifflin, District Judge Batts lambasted any contention held by the defendants that 60 Years Later was a work of parodic comment or criticism: "the Court found such contentions to be post-hoc rationalizations employed through vague generalizations about the alleged naiveté of original, rather than reasonably perceivable parody. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:56 pm
Bauer has described, the McCarran-Ferguson Act was a direct response by Congress to a decision of the United States Supreme Court explicitly holding that the insurance industry and its various activities were conducted in interstate commerce and therefore affirmatively subject to the prohibitions of federal antitrust law.5 Thus, the McCarran-Ferguson constitutes an important alteration of the shape of American antitrust law, which has been identified as the "Magna Carta of free… [read post]