Search for: "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United States" Results 181 - 200 of 361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am by Mark Ashton
Mariani all the more interesting is that since this evolution in the Commonwealth’s legal thinking the United States Supreme Court has weighed in with cases that suggest that decisions by state courts premised upon a family’s right to privacy may not be consistent with textual or original intent as articulated in the Constitution itself. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:00 pm
Those cases are: the Pennsylvania Superior Court's recent ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Pittsburgh, decided yesterday by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (Judge Patricia A. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Some me­dals and dull jests are mentioned and represented as a ground of quarrel be­tween the English and Dutch in 1672, and likewise caused Louis the XIV to make an expedition into the United Provinces of the Netherlands in the same year, and nearly ruined that Commonwealth. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:59 am
The Third Circuit did not break new ground here, relying on past precedent:In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
"Plaintiffs' brief before the Commonwealth Court repeatedly invoked their rights under the Pennsylvania Constitution, but never directly mentioned their rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm by James R. Marsh
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied relief in an order entered January 8, 2009.[7] The Court was forced to reconsider its ruling when, on January 26, 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office announced that it had charged Judge Ciavarella and his mentor, Judge Michael T. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:20 am
This exception was recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Pennsylvania v. [read post]