Search for: "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Few books can get you from the rainy coast of Newfoundland over 19th-century Holstein straight to sunny Queensland and back to the North of Pennsylvania, while telling stories of a retired MI5 agent, the largest Ponzi scheme in history, a company founded by the 41st President of the United States, the aftermath of the First Gulf War, and the collapse of the Federal Bank of Australia. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 5:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
This amounts to an absolute and indefinite prohibition upon the acquisition of firearms by the citizens of this Commonwealth—a result in clear tension with the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 21 of the Pennsylvania Constitution ["The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Aaron Weems
Obergefell bookends a volatile two years in the Federal Court system which began with the decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:01 am by Stuart A. Carpey
In March 2009, Judge Joy Flowers Conti of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, issued an opinion  in  Tristani v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:03 am
  In Mountain View, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ruled that the lower court did not err in its  calculation and award of attorney’s fees which the condominium was entitled to recover from a unit owner. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Like the United States Supreme Court, there are few cases the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is required to hear; instead, the court decides, at its discretion, which appeals from the intermediate appellate courts it wants to hear. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:29 pm
 However, two recent decisions by the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania have found that ownership interest of 71% and 41.26% in the new company were sufficient to constitute continuity of ownership. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Specifically, the court was asked to decide if the legislature, by including these items within the definition of “tobacco products,” violated the due process clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. [read post]