Search for: "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2008, 4:29 pm
 However, two recent decisions by the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania have found that ownership interest of 71% and 41.26% in the new company were sufficient to constitute continuity of ownership. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Specifically, the court was asked to decide if the legislature, by including these items within the definition of “tobacco products,” violated the due process clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:00 pm
Those cases are: the Pennsylvania Superior Court's recent ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Some me­dals and dull jests are mentioned and represented as a ground of quarrel be­tween the English and Dutch in 1672, and likewise caused Louis the XIV to make an expedition into the United Provinces of the Netherlands in the same year, and nearly ruined that Commonwealth. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:59 am
The Third Circuit did not break new ground here, relying on past precedent:In United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
"Plaintiffs' brief before the Commonwealth Court repeatedly invoked their rights under the Pennsylvania Constitution, but never directly mentioned their rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]