Search for: "Commonwealth v. Adams" Results 81 - 100 of 112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm by Graeme Hall
Tactics “unduly inflexible” and used “unjustified force” Secretary of State for the Foreign Office & Commonwealth Affairs v Maftah & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 350 (13 April 2011) : Court of appeal: Review of financial anti-terror sanctions imposed on 2 Libyans not a determination of article 6 ECHR civil rights Rahman, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWHC 944 (Admin) (31 March 2011): High Court rules Birmingham… [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Brady and the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court case Sehl v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Last week, two more decisions in favor of the severance of post-Koken claims were handed down by the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, by Order only, on the basis of filings by the tortfeasor defendant:Saltzburg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Hudson’s decision in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Other judges, from York and Adams counties, have followed suit.The main rationale put forth in those severance decisions is primarily that evidence of "insurance" is not admissible in personal injury civil litigation matters under Pa.R.E. 411. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Other judges, from York and Adams counties, have followed suit.The main rationale put forth in those severance decisions is primarily that evidence of "insurance" is not admissible in personal injury civil litigation matters under Pa.R.E. 411. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:38 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Kuhn of the Adams County Court of Common Pleas ruled in favor of the severance of the third party claims against the tortfeasor from the UIM claims asserted against the two separate levels of UIM carriers.In his Opinion, Judge Kuhn, apparently aware of at least some of the other cases previously handed down across the Commonwealth on this issue, chose to compare and contrast the rationale of the Pike County Court of Common Pleas in the case of Jannone v. [read post]