Search for: "Commonwealth v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 10:16 am
The Court contrasted the Davis case with its other decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 5:28 pm
Continue reading The post SJC Oral argument in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
Here is the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 12:56 am
Stratton v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 9:19 pm
Commonwealth, 2012 Ky. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:53 pm
A jury was empaneled last week in Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 7:55 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Recently, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:46 pm
In a 4-3 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:19 am
In Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm
Chief Justice Thomas tells you most of what you need to know in the first paragraph of today's opinion:"The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands restricts voting in certain elections to individuals of 'Northern Marianas descent.' This appeal presents the question of whether this restriction is race-based and violates the Fifteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:55 pm
Geithner and Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:56 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court will hear arguments this Friday September 7, 2018 in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
Commonwealth, 46 Va. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 4:15 am
Her third-party complaint (full text) in Miller v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 3:18 am
Commonwealth, 49 Va. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 12:23 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
PA: Need to secure a vehicle for officer safety does not require that the officer actually see a gun
15 Jul 2008, 12:23 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
A central thesis of this chapter is that it is questionable whether the reasoning of Dixon J in the Cold War Era cases (Sharkey, Burns v Ransley, Communisty Party Case, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Case) as well as the reasoning in subsequent pivotal executive power cases in the High Court such as AAP and Davis, support the development of an inherent executive “nationhood” power in s 61 of the Constitution. [read post]
