Search for: "Commonwealth v. Friedman"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 8:44 am
Lawrence Friedman (New England Law | Boston) has posted Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
On January 19, 2011, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued an Opinion in the case of Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 10:13 am
Nov. 17, 2011 McGinley, Cohn Jubelirer, Friedman, JJ.) [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:10 am
FRIEDMAN: I think that issue is entirely orthogonal to the issue here because the Commonwealth is acknowledging -CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I’m sorry. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
(Opinion by Friedman, S.J.), the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed the entry of a summary judgment in favor of municipality defendants against a claim that the subject car accident was caused by black ice. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 2:50 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:56 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Beware of the Statute of LimitationsIn a March 12, 2014 decision, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held in the case of Daniel v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:14 pm
In the case of Allen v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
Procito v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its November 20, 2013 decision in the case of Shaw v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its November 20, 2013 decision in the case of Shaw v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:41 am
Yesterday, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court issued its opinion in Wood v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held the rule of Melendez-Diaz not to be retroactive — and it did so in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania rules against Club Kama Sutra in dispute with city of Philadelphia5-5-2008 Pennsylvania:A divided Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has ruled in favor of old-fashioned dining etiquette, ruling that sexual activity is not an accessory use to a restaurant.The split seven-judge panel upheld a trial court's ruling against Club Kama Sutra in Philadelphia.In MAJ Entertainment Inc. v. the City of Philadelphia, the panel consisting of… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
" Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Fiser v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
