Search for: "Commonwealth v. Graves" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2014, 4:01 pm by Michael Stevens
 Commonwealth of Kentucky from Graves County (criminal law) and No. 384 Spalding v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 1:28 pm by Michael Stevens
Brann v Commonwealth of Kentucky Graves County; COA Opinion Vacating and Remanding On appeal, Brann argues that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his probation in light of recently enacted Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) 439.3106 and that […] [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:15 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
The Supreme Court has, by a majority, dismissed both the appeal by the Secretary of State and the cross appeal in Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anor v Rahmatullah [2012] UKSC 48. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark.  [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
”The court found none of the above circumstances present, explaining, “[Plaintiff] has not advanced any facts to show that the forum selection clause specifically was obtained by fraud or overreaching…[and Plaintiff] offered no evidence that it will be gravely inconvenient or that it would be unfair to litigate this case in the forum state to which it agreed. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
The one earlier judicial reference I could find was in a dissent to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's 1943 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:37 am by Rosalind English
Omar, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs  [2013] EWCA Civ 118 – read judgment Angus McCullough QC of 1 Crown Office Row acted as a special advocate in this case. [read post]