Search for: "Commonwealth v. Hernandez" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 1:46 am by Ken Lammers
Thus, if a judge agrees to continue a case without any findings, a defendant could be required to complete conditions by the Commonwealth and have the Commonwealth move for a dismissal upon completion.Taylor v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am by Richard Hunt
In contrast to Hernandez, the Court in Drenth v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (Bancoult No 2) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 22 June 2015. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]