Search for: "Commonwealth v. Kerr" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2011, 10:12 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Fourth Circuit has decided its mandate cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
The Supreme Court has recently granted him permission to appeal the Court of Appeal’s decision in the related case of R (Bancoult (No 3)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] EWCA Civ 708. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 2 July 2012 in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and anor v Yunus Rahmatullah in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Dyson, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
She also agreed more with Lord Kerr that the material collectively provided by the publication of the book “Slaughter and Deception at Batang Kali” in June 2009 and the access gained to the Metropolitan and Royal Malaysian Police files “cast an entirely new light on the decision not to hold an inquiry”. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by JULIE BALL, TRAINEE, MATRIX CHAMBERS
However, the burden of the submissions resisting the appeal falls to the two interested parties: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs; Government Communications Headquarters. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale, dissenting on the issue of improper motive, considered that the Court of Appeal should have recognised that there was a substantial possibility that the Administrative Court would have taken a different view of the evidence heard in cross-examination if they had admitted the cable and the case had proceeded to its conventional conclusion. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 3:14 pm by Orin Kerr
But a few days after I posted my draft, the Massachusetts Supreme Court Judicial Court invited amici to submit briefs on this exact question in a case called Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by SHG
As that well-known legal wag Orin Kerr put it, why bother? [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am by Laura Sandwell
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs & Anor v Rahmatullah, heard 2 – 3 July 2012. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]