Search for: "Commonwealth v. Kerr" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
 Finally, NPR’s On the Media interviewed Orin Kerr about the opinion. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:10 am by Laura Sandwell
In the Privy Council this week is the two day hearing of The Superintendent of Her Majesty’s Foxhill Prison & Anor v Kozeny (Bahamas), which is on appeal from the Court of Appeal of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas and will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 28-29 Jun 2017. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
Also at Volokh, Orin Kerr takes a look back at Frank v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am by Orin S. Kerr
   Unless I'm missing something, Valdez joins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
  Last week, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court handed down what I believe is the first appellate decision on the question, Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 11:31 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Cal. 2017) (arrest by state officer "needed to be supported by probable cause based on the elements of those state laws"); Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:25 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Since 1968, federal law has prohibited the use of bugging devices — secret microphones — to record private conversations. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed… [read post]