Search for: "Communications Workers v. Labor Board" Results 41 - 60 of 585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
On August 29, 2023, the Appeals Board issued its second en banc decision upholding its earlier decision [Nunes v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:20 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
The NLRA protects workerslabor organizing rights and regulates the relationship between labor unions and employers. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:20 pm by Lindsay Burke
”  Ehling filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board, which found no privacy violation and no unfair labor practice, because the hospital management had not itself accessed or solicited the wall post. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:44 am by Lindsay Burke
”  Ehling filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board, which found no privacy violation and no unfair labor practice, because the hospital management had not itself accessed or solicited the wall post. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
City and County of San Francisco (1st—A165231) Workers’ Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule—Public Employers—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, held that plaintiff firefighter employed by San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) was barred by workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule in Labor Code §§ 3600(a), 3601(a) and 3602(a) from pursuing personal injury claim against…… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
LEXIS 255 (Appeals Board noteworthy panel decision)] that Labor Code § 3212.86 presumption of industrial causation applied, that defendant did not rebut presumptio [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:00 am by Attorney Theodore Ronca
A decision issued this week, on 5/1/12, “Zamora v Neurologic Assn. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
However, WCAB panel decisions are not binding precedent, as are en banc decisions, on all other Appeals Board panels and workers’ compensation judges [see Gee v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Thirty-one years ago, the Court of Appeal issued its decision in Shipley v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Hamilton, Former Assistant Secretary and Deputy Commissioner, California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board The workers’ compensation community has been abuzz since the Appeals Board issued its most recent en banc decision, Nunes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:14 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Further, even though the Supreme Court declared long ago that the use of recurrent or intermittent work stoppages is unprotected by the Act, Auto Workers Local 232 v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
WCAB’s New Guidelines for Application of Labor Code § 4664(c)(1) In the recent Appeals Board Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Stranak v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
” Finally, the Board also failed to establish that the alleged unfair labor practices actually prevented communications between the employees and the union. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:35 pm by Sophia Z. Lee
Twelve years later in Communications Workers of America v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The Implications of Zurich” ( https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/insights/legal/workers-compensation/b/recent-cases-news-trends-developments/posts/california-is-shipley-on-life-support-the-implications-of-zurich ), examines a panel decision ( Mayor v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:32 am by Kara M. Maciel
By: Paul Rosenberg Last week the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) urged the U.S. [read post]