Search for: "Community Economic Development v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 6:00 am
The concept has evolved in response to the 2005 landmark United States Supreme Court ruling in City of New London v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm
Task Force Plan for Space Industry Workforce and Economic Development. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
In the decision, the court held that the government could take private property to transfer it to another private owner for the purpose of economic development, claiming that the economic growth enjoyed by the community from new private developments could constitute a valid public purpose. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:10 am
Because of the American Towers ruling, it has been difficult for community associations to pursue claims against developers.In 2002, the Court limited the Economic Loss Doctrine somewhat in the case of Hermansen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:57 pm
The role of law must be to delineate property rights in a manner whichtakes account of, and balances, private economic and other arguments such as community cohesion, economic development and social justice concerns. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
City of New London, the Supreme Court ruled that state and local governments have the power to take private property and transfer it to other private owners in order to promote “economic development. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 06-2020). [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
No central economic planning is in place. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States, ___ F.3d ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Thus, the legislature has charged local governments with facilitating the provision of housing for all economic segments of the community through the implementation of "housing elements" as part of the community's general plan. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:13 pm
United States (United States fiduciary duty)Akiachak Native Community v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:36 pm
United States on 12/3/15. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 11:47 am
Lamott (Violence Against Women Act) United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
(Economic Development; Tribal Lending; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) The Cherokee Nation et al. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:29 pm
She cited some cases about corporate responsibility in war crimes, such as Khulumani (United States), Sanader (Croatia), Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
United States (Federal Taxation) Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
United States (Federal Taxation) Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:43 am
In the United States, rebates are negotiated by PBMs, whose function is to define formularies on behalf of health insurers. [read post]
