Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 221 - 240 of 1,980
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Linda D. Jellum
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
One company does the market research and the other follows. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[10] The employee, a worker for a home nursing company that sold services to nursing facilities, reported substandard care at one of the facilities.[11] The court acknowledged that the employee's speech may have harmed the employer's "business relationship with their customer,"[12] but concluded that such speech is "the exact kind of 'expression[] regarding public concerns that are motivated by an employee's desire to speak out as a… [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” The latter conveys the same longing for peaceful coexistence that the mistaken paraphrase does, and indeed, King went on to say, wishfully, “we can get along. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Two of the companies would donate more than $1 million to Republican campaigns after getting those deals. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
A German citizen has brought a lawsuit against the European Commission alleging violations of the EU GDPR. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
They strongarm the company's leadership into resigning, take over, and bleed the company of $14 mil via bogus trusts, shell companies, and "consulting" arrangements—leaving 1,200 public stockholders with nothing. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
It does, however, indicate how investors themselves may also be exposed to claims of a similar nature. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:23 pm by Cindy Cohn
We weren’t alone in this—our friends at Public Citizen had a huge role in developing this caselaw, as did the ACLU, EPIC, and many private attorneys over the years. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Hillel Y. Levin
” After surveying this history, the Court concluded that, “apart from a handful of late 19th century jurisdictions, the historical record” at issue in the case “does not demonstrate a tradition of broadly prohibiting the public carry of commonly used firearms for self-defense” nor “any such historical tradition limiting public carry only to those law-abiding citizens who demonstrate a special need for self-defense. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Daphne Keller, Max Levy
Should researchers have access to public posts that users have since deleted, for exampl [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am by Matthew D. Lee
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overruling long-standing precedent in Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
 And “such beliefs could easily require de facto beneficial ownership of some rather spacious tracts of public property. [read post]