Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am
Trump’s TikTok Order does not simply direct the Attorney General not to enforce the statute for a period of time; it does everything it can to declare TikTok’s continued operation entirely lawful during that period, despite the fact that the company is now banned by the statute. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
This week, I've blogged on a forthcoming article about the Supreme Court case Tyler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:47 am
And indeed the noted Murthy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am
Previously, only the largest property management companies could afford sophisticated market analysis, maintaining teams of analysts to track market trends and optimize pricing strategies. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
But see State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 1:59 am
Meanwhile, the public is abandoning legacy media at a run, turning to new media in the form of blogs and citizen journalists. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
S. ____ (2025)1Per CuriamNOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in theUnited States Reports. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:19 am
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
Harvie Wilkinson reasoned that, even after Bruen, the Second Amendment does not protect a right to own assault weapons. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 7:53 am
In Murphy-Hylton v. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 9:05 am
” The Petitioners’ reasoning followed the typical constitutional test that arises in First Amendment cases: if the First Amendment applies (as it does when US citizens and companies are “speaking”) and if the law is content-based (as TikTok contends here) then strict scrutiny applies and the government has the steep task of proving that the law furthers a “compelling interest” and is “narrowly tailored. [read post]
13 Jan 2025, 5:57 am
After more than two hours of argument Friday morning in TikTok v. [read post]
12 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The Second Circuit had previously affirmed the dismissal of such claims against an external auditor because its audit certification—which incorrectly certified a company’s accounting practices as compliant with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards—merely reflected standardized language. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
The irony here, of course, is that is precisely what conservatives were able to argue successfully in another corporate speech case--Citizens United (2010)--a case that focused on the right of people in the US to consume speech wherever it is produced, even by organs grounded in the property rights of shareholders but detached from their direct operational control (in public companies sometimes at least) the ACLU does not like (to put it mildly) but which it might… [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:55 am
Trump aspires to two years of “frictionless government,” contrary to Justice Louis Brandeis’s observation in Myers v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 8:24 am
Raimondo and its well-established decision in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:18 pm
In Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 5:59 am
Intel Corp. v. [read post]
