Search for: "Concepcion v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Imburgia v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:21 am
In March 2006, the Concepcions filed a complaint against AT&T in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:53 pm
On April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:13 pm
Betancourt v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
CantoC02E, L.P., where the Court of Appeal “dismissed Concepcion in a footnote,” and Franco v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:09 am
Dukes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
Moreno on its docket awaiting oral argument after remand from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm
” The lawsuit was filed in 2008, prior to the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Concepcion. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:19 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States granted review and vacated that decision, remanding the case for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion 563 U.S. ___ (2011). [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
The bottom line: Even California state courts are coming to accept arbitration of class employment claims on an individual basis in the wake of Concepcion. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
In April 2011, with trial imminent, the United States Supreme Court handed down Concepcion. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:45 pm
2011 will surely go down as the Year of the Class Action in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
AT&T Mobility v Concepcion is only the latest foray in this direction. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:03 pm
The following excerpt summarizes Stone's findings: [T]the eighteen cases are, in chronological order, United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Concepcion, No. 09-893. [read post]
