Search for: "Condon v. People"
Results 1 - 20
of 417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 7:27 am
” But speech intended to “promote or condone” crime, even violent crime, is protected by the First Amendment unless (a) it’s intended to and likely to produce imminent illegal conduct (see Brandenburg v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
. - Justice Robert Jackson, dissenting in Korematsu v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:13 pm
People can bluff, and they can hide material facts. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:42 pm
On the other hand, the Federal Court of Appeal has just decided, in Condon v Canada, that if the plaintiffs allege damages, that is sufficient for the action to be certified. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:11 am
People v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:55 am
Two recent decisions of CAAF condone unlawful or bad practices when OSI, CID, NCIS, and CGIS search cellphones; United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
More like a badass.Not that I'm condoning assassination. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 6:18 am
People v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:09 am
Indeed, as shown below, often a us-v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
In three prior appeals, of which we took judicial notice, the same prosecutor was criticized for improper conduct, including the observation in People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 7:44 am
The answer is no.The case is Palma v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Further, said the court, "[I]t is the responsibility of the administrative agency to weigh the evidence and choose from among competing inferences therefrom and, so long as the inference drawn and the ultimate determination made are supported by substantial evidence, it is not for the court to substitute its judgment for that of the administrative agency," citing Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:19 am
Previously, the Court held that where, as here, a prosecutor seeks testimony that the defendant’s version of events was not believable, the witness’s “. . . testimony is equivalent to an opinion that the defendant is guilty, and the receipt of such testimony may not be condoned (People v Williams, 6 NY2d 18, 23 [1959]; People v Higgins, 5 NY2d 607, 627-628 [1959]; People v Gradon, 43 AD2d 842 [2d Dept 1984]). [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:27 pm
True enough, in People v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
OCSD does not condone deputies utilizing the CAR system in the course of their duties. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 11:30 am
(b); see People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:39 am
Massie v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 7:10 am
See Winston v. [read post]
