Search for: "Condon v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2018, 6:10 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
“of late, an important shift has occurred in the views of state and lower federal courts, which have increasingly found fault with “new-generation” SORN laws, which in many respects are more expansive and onerous than those condoned by the” Supreme Court in Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
  Which added, albeit in a footnote, the following: "We are not in any way condoning the prosecutor? [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:46 am by SHG
Smith offers a solution. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 10:04 pm by Rumpole
Oral argument today at SCOTUS in Southern Union Company v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Also, "Allowing law enforcement officers to target people based solely on characteristics such as ethnicity or national origin is to ʹcondone ethnic harassment.ʺ Zuniga‐Perez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:39 am
Supreme Court case of Cavazos v. [read post]